Parenting Against the Patriarchy

patplogoYou may have noticed that the site title, Twitter name and Facebook page have changed!

Don’t worry, we’re still the same blog you’ve always loved, we’ve just expanded our ethos a little. I don’t really identify as a mother (I am transgender) but I am a parent just the same, and I realised that the old title – Mothers For Women’s Lib – might have alienated male and genderqueer parents and implied that feminism works solely for women. Of course we know that feminism works for everyone, in an attempt to destroy kyriarchy and patriarchy. So we’ve rebranded as Parenting Against the Patriarchy, and I hope you’ll enjoy our new vision.

Also we’re looking for writers! If you’re a parent or carer of any gender and you have something to say, whether you’d like to be a guest blogger or a regular contributor, shoot me an email; I’d love to have you on board!

Posted in introduction, Site News | Leave a comment

We’re coming back!

Sorry for the long hiatus, but hopefully Mothers For Women’s Lib will be back really soon!

Here’s your chance to request a post. You tell me what you’d like a feminist parent’s perspective on, and I’ll make sure it happens. Go go go!

Posted in Site News | Leave a comment

Apparently women of “childbearing age” shouldn’t be allowed psych meds…

Philippa wrote a post at The F Word about a “psychiatrist and Professor of women’s health” who has said that women of childbearing age shouldn’t be given antidepressants or antipsychotics in case they accidentally get pregnant. Philippa deftly covers the misogyny ingrained in this, in the concept that a potential foetus is considered to be more important than an adult woman’s mental health for anything from thirty to forty years.

I had a couple more thoughts about this. The first is that it’s pretty heterosexist to assume all women of childbearing age are likely to have sex with men; it completely erases the existence of lesbians and asexual people. Alongside this is the reality that not all women have the capacity to become pregnant (trans women and infertile cis women spring to mind) and many men do.

The second thought I had was “oh gods, another psychiatrist who has absolutely no clue about the safety of psychiatric medication in pregnancy and breastfeeding”. You see, I spent a pregnancy taking antidepressants, with my doctor’s approval. I am currently taking antidepressants and antipsychotics, while trying to conceive, with the complete support of my psychiatrist. If my psychiatrist can see that the benefits to my mental health outweigh the risks to a potential foetus, why can’t this doctor?

Unfortunately I am aware that there are fewer doctors and psychiatrists like mine than I’d like there to be. The majority, unfortunately, are ignorant and uneducated about the safety of various medications in pregnancy – give me a copy of Hale and I’d be more informed than they are! Even many drugs considered “contraindicated” are normally safe, and there are levels of safety to be considered, rather than a simple dichotomy between “safe” and “NEVER safe”. But, not wanting to break the illusion of Doctor/Psychiatrist As All Knowing God Figure, they basically make things up and impose a blanket ban on medications during pregnancy because it would harm their precious egos to admit they’re not sure and then go and look it up.

It’s pretty scary to think that a lot of doctors are going to see this psychiatrist’s report and see that it reinforces their own misguided opinions, and that women’s mental health care might be in jeopardy as a result. It just feels like a huge step back in both the rights of women as human beings, and the rights of the mentally ill to receive treatment for their illnesses. As someone who comes under both categories, I can only hope that more doctors and psychiatrists take the time to admit their ignorance and educate themselves about the real risk factors of psychiatric medications to foetuses.

Posted in breastfeeding, mental health, mothers, pregnancy | 7 Comments

Talking to kids about sex

A couple of years ago I wrote a post about how to teach a child about sex. Now The Mamafesto has written a post in a similar vein which raises some really important thoughts, called Let’s Talk.

Posted in education, sex | Leave a comment

Cool collection of Halloween costumes for girls (and boys)

Reblogged from Reel Girl:

Click to visit the original post

Tired of sexed-up, "cute," and endless princesses and rainbow fairies marketed to your daughters on Halloween?

A Mighty Girl has put together a great collection of awesome costumes.

My three year old is super- psyched to be Batgirl. We actually own this, but I bought a new one because ours is worn, ripped,  and missing parts.

(Of course, potential Batgirl enthusiasts would be helped along if there were multiple Batgirl movies and derivative toys, games, and clothing.

Read more… 30 more words

Wee Chum's costume is already sorted this year, but I thought some of Mothers For Women's Lib readers might enjoy this.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Teaching children about their right to bodily autonomy

Jane Murphy has written an excellent post over at Offbeat Mama.

Autonomy doesn’t automatically mean enlightenment. Responsible ownership must include education — seat belts and bike helmets must be worn, vegetables need to be eaten, hands must be held in busy parking lots, hair must be brushed. I insist that she do these things not to assert dominance over her but because, as her mother, it is my job to teach her how to care for the frame that her persona will inhabit for her entire life.

Having her own body is a privilege. I want her to discover that her body is capable of amazing things. I want her to feel the power that comes with a sense of total control over her own private and finite space in the world. The sense of satisfaction that comes with enthusiastic consent, and the feeling of self worth that comes with a firmly stated “No.” The ability to exercise that control over her anatomy is one that comes with time, but it is her birthright.

Click here to read the full article.

Posted in boundaries, children's rights | Leave a comment

“That’s sexism against fathers!”

I feel like I’ve heard this argument a hundred thousand times. “When a couple divorces, the mother always gets the kids. That’s sexism against men!” It’s usually trotted out by ‘men’s rights activists’ but I’ve heard it from seemingly ordinary, reasonable men as well, and it really bothers me. Because, you see, it is actually the same old sexism against women which causes this to happen.

When a heterosexual couple with children decide to part ways, sometimes they come to an amicable conclusion as to who will be the ‘parent with care’; that is, the parent with whom the child or children will live most of the time. But sometimes, when things are more acrimonious, it is up to a court to decide who ‘gets custody’ of the children. And yes, a lot of the time, it ends up being the mother who becomes the parent with care. And yes, on the surface this doesn’t seem fair…

…until you look into why she gets given custody. You see, the legal system isn’t skewed in favour of women because it necessarily decrees that women are automatically better or more important parents. Instead, it looks at what will cause the least disruption to the children’s lives. We live in a patriarchal society which tells us that the only valuable thing a woman can do with her time is to raise her husband or boyfriend’s children. Childcare is “women’s work”. So in the vast majority of families with a mother and a father, it is the mother who has been doing the lion’s share of the childcare since the first days of their children’s lives.

So of course, a court looks at a family’s situation and says, who are these kids used to being with most of the time? If the father has been a stay-at-home-dad, the court will award him custody of the children, because that would cause the least disruption to their lives. But we know this isn’t usually the case, so because the kids are accustomed to being cared for by Mum most of the time, they are left in the full-time care of Mum – not because courts are discriminating against Dad, but because it’s easier on the children.

So the next time some dude starts moaning at you about how his kids (or his brother’s kids, or his buddy’s kids) were ‘given’ to their mother unfairly, ask him who had been doing most of the childcare before the relationship came to an end, and point out to him that perhaps if we lived in a less sexist society which emphasised the importance of fathers caring for their children as well as mothers, things might have been more ‘fair’.

Posted in fathers, gender stereotypes, mothers, sexism | 2 Comments